Red Cross Apologizes for Tweeting False Typhoon Haiyan Image

Link to Article

On Monday, November 11th, Red Cross posted an inaccurate graphic image comparing the size of Typhoon Haiyan to the continental U.S. The tweet read, "A storm the size of Typhoon Haiyan would cover nearly the entire continental U.S." The tweet went viral, with users retweeting the shocking image more than 700 times and appearing in blogs before the Red Cross issued a correction and apology hours later. Before the apology, Nate Cohn from The New Republic noticed the incorrect image that the Red Cross posted and tweeted "The map of Haiyan over the United States is a hoax and inaccurate". This prompted the Red Cross to looking into the inaccurate image and eventually issuing the correction and apology.

Although the Red Cross put out an immediate apology, it was an avoidable mistake that should have been caught before it went public. It is especially important for non-profit organizations such as Red Cross that seek donations to gain credibility and trust from the public. When people look to donate their money for a cause, it is important that they feel confident in the organization's ability to properly handle and allocate their funds. A loss of credibility over a false tweet can really affect people's decision to donate to the organization.

Twitter IPO

Link to article

Twitter, the online social networking and micro blogging service, had an initial public offering (IPO) on November 7, 2013. The company launched in 2006 and generates around $140 million in revenue per year and boasts around 200 million users worldwide. Prior to the IPO, private venture capital investors valued the company at more than $1.2 billion. Only a dozen private companies are valued over $1 billion and many of them have already had informal talks with bankers in regards to going public. Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and JP Morgan led the Twitter IPO and raised nearly $2 billion. A major concern around this IPO, is the lack of profits that Twitter has generated, but the current share price of $41 proves that it is no obstacle. The success of this IPO, paves the way for other private tech companies to rationalize their valuations, such as the company Square and Airbnb, which are exploring the possibility of going public in the near future.

Other companies such as Dropbox, Pinterest and Snapchat have raised valuations in the billions in a short period of time. Venture Capital investors are recognizing that social media services have huge potential to turn their mass users into reliable sources of revenue, even before posting a profit. When a company such as Twitter, is able to touch that many people, there is always a way to make money out of it. Every company is beginning to implement marketing strategies around facebook, twitter, tumblr, youtube, as they are becoming crucial elements in the success of these organizations. A Google ventures partner claimed that this Twitter IPO shows there is a strong demand for consumer web and tech companies which have not yet fully developed their business fundamentals.

Use Your Mind to Drive a Car

Use your Mind to Drive a Car

Alejo Bernal, a graduate of Design Academy Eindhoven, has recently developed a toy car that can be driven forward with thought, using NeuroSky EEG Headset. Aside from using this gadget for recreational purposes, individuals diagnosed with attention deficit disorders can also benefit from this technology. According to Bernal, "As you try to focus, the increased light intensity of the vehicle indicates the level of attention you have reached. Once the maximum level is achieved and retained for seven seconds, the vehicle starts moving forward. This project has helped users to develop deeper, longer concentration by exercising the brain. IT is possible for people to train or treat their minds through their own efforts and not necessarily using strong medicines, such as ritalin." This is a monumental advancement in EEG technology, which has been used in the past to control drones, exoskeletons, and even other human beings.

The mind controlled car is only in its prototype phase and not expected to hit markets anytime in the near future. However, the advancement of this technology is fascinating and can potentially lead to very effective treatments for patients and may even change the ways cars are driven some day! I am curious to see how the EEG sensors continue to advance and determine how strong the mind truly is.

Mobile Device Delivers Rapid AIDS Test Results in an Hour

Link to Article

A nanotechnology firm by the name of Nanobioysm created a mobile device that can accurately test for AIDS/HIV in under an hour. The Gene-Radar is an iPad sized device that works by taking a drop of saliva, blood, or other bodily fluid and placing it on a nanochip that is put into the device. This new technology has the potentially revolutionize medicine by tracking disease outbreaks and helping contain them in remote places of the Earth. In places like Rwanda where there is an AIDS epidemic, they have tests that are fact but not accurate and others that are high in accuracy but take 6 moths to yield results. Even in the US, the "gold standard" tests take at least 2 weeks to get results and can cost $200. The Gene-Radar cuts the cost of these tests almost 50 to 100 times cheaper.

The new technology not only helps cut costs and turnaround time for the results, but it helps with the containment of the disease as well. The results get stored in a cloud so the data can be monitored and analyzed. The CEO of Nanobioysm states that there are 4 billion people on earth without access to healthcare and technology can change that. Instead of reactive care in hospitals and physician offices, this new device can help with preventative care. They are already working on new models that are smaller in size and possibly ingestible in the future.  

Facebook Lowers Age to Allow Teens to Post Publicly

Link to Article

For the first time, Facebook is allowing teenagers ages 13-17 to have a public voice on the social media platform. Prior to this decision, teens on Facebook were only allowed to share content with friends, friends of friends, and custom groups. According to Facebook, this age group of people are among the savviest users of social media that simply want to be heard. Any teenager that wants to share a status update or post publicly must first manually change the audience setting on his post to "public" before sharing. After doing so, a pop-up explains that the post will be visible to everyone on the site. The post will go live once the user clicks "ok" on this pop-up box, acknowledging he has seen the warning and intends to share publicly. Currently, if a user shares a post publicly, the audience setting will remain on "public" for the user's next post. For teens, a second reminder message will pop up if they choose to post publicly the next time around.

What are some reasons why Facebook decided to make the sudden change? They have been around for nearly 10 years and have always had a large population of teenage users. If the organization had not deemed it as a safe practice in the past, what could have led to this decision? "While only a small fraction of teens using Facebook might choose to post publicly, this update now gives them the choice to share more broadly, just like on other social media services." This comment makes it clear that the organization is trying to keep up with competitors in order to keep their teenage population active on Facebook. What are parents' views on this? Would you feel comfortable having your teenager post publicly on the platform? What are some of the repercussions that can arise from this?

Your Face May Appear in a Google Ad Soon

Link to Article

Google is following Facebook's footsteps in using its users for advertisement purposes without compensating them. The company announced that users' names, profile pictures, and endorsements may appear on
reviews, advertisements and other commercial contexts under a new terms of service. According to Google, "shared endorsements" help people "save time" and improve results. Recommendations from people that users already know is relevant and useful. Users may now think twice before they press the +1 button on endorsements of products and services. Otherwise, their face may appear on others' Google + accounts. The organization does give users the ability to opt out of the program and is targeting adults over 18. However, how many people will actually be aware of this and make the change to their settings?  

Based on the comments of the article, it seems as though the public has mixed feelings about this recent news. While some people simply do not care that their faces will appear on future advertisements, others are disgruntled that they are not being compensated by Google. Of course, there are those strongly feel that this is an infringement of privacy. What are your thoughts on this matter? Do you feel taken advantage of?

Instagram Will Bring Advertisements in the Near Future

Link to Article

Instagram is a hugely popular free photo and video sharing service that has become widely downloaded by users in the past several years. The organization recently announced that they will be serving ads to their users in the near future. They will be taking a subtle approach by delivering the advertisements in small numbers and in the form of photos and videos from a handful of brands that are already members of the Instagram community. Their objective is to make the ads feel as natural as possible so that it will not mar the user experience. Users will have the option to hide ads that they do not like and even provide feedback. As of now, the ads will be limited to users only in the United States. Instagram's reason for introducing advertisements is to build a sustainable business that will be able to support and prepare for the large future plans of the organization.

Is it inevitable for all large social media sites and applications to use advertisements in order to financially sustain themselves while continuing to offer free services? Even the social media giant Facebook was once without advertisements. Once the free site started growing exponentially in users and advanced in applications and programs, they implemented an aggressive advertisement plan to increase revenues. If that is the case, even though the ads may be annoying to some degree and is not a user-favorite, isn't it worth it for users to deal with them in order for them to continue enjoying free services with new and upgraded features?